Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates hydroxyapatite formation in response to bioinspired ligands, suggesting design principles for crystal growth.
The selective stabilization of hydroxyapatite (HAP) crystal facets by acidic biomolecules plays a central role in biomineralization, yet the mechanistic distinction between facet-specific HAP stabilization and promotion of metastable calcium phosphate phases remains unclear. Here, we systematically examine HAP crystallization in the presence of polycarboxylate ligands─EDTA, citrate, polyglutamate (E6 and E13), and the dentin-derived (DSS)4 repeat─to determine how carboxylate spacing and ligand architecture influence calcium phosphate phase selection and morphology. Scanning electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and multinuclear solid-state NMR reveal that EDTA, citrate, and polyglutamate favor the formation of sheet-like HAP enriched in (001) surface exposure, whereas (DSS)4 promotes ribbon-like nanocrystals dominated by octacalcium phosphate (OCP). Hydrothermal treatment converts OCP-containing products to phase-pure HAP, enabling direct comparison of ligand-dependent defect structures. 1H MAS NMR identifies hydroxylated surface calcium sites across all samples and detects hydrogen phosphate and crystalline water environments diagnostic of OCP in (DSS)4-templated materials, while 31P CP-MAS spectra confirm complete OCP-to-HAP transformation after hydrothermal conversion. These results support a geometric recognition model in which short-spaced carboxylates preferentially stabilize the HAP (001) surface, whereas extended anionic spacing favors OCP-related lattice arrangements. This work establishes design principles for peptide-mediated control of calcium phosphate crystal growth and facet expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: