Reveals improved interlayer bonding in 3D concrete printing using electrostatic deposition, suggesting enhanced durability.
Weak interlayer bonding in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing (3DCP) is a persistent structural limitation arising from sequential layer deposition, which creates porous “cold joint” zones susceptible to cracking and anisotropic failure. This study presents a novel automated electrostatic dry-powder deposition system that applies supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) onto each extruded layer without moisture addition, process interruption or mix-design modification. A corona-discharge spray gun mounted 60 mm behind the extrusion nozzle delivered Class F fly ash (FA) or ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) at a calibrated dosage of 100 ± 10 g/m2 across all printed layers. Performance was assessed through flexural and compressive strength at 7, 28 and 56 days, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), 56-day drying shrinkage, and scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The study is positioned as a comparative evaluation of relative interlayer improvement under fixed mix and printing conditions. FA-treated specimens achieved the highest long-term gains, with 13.8% and 41.1% increases in flexural and compressive strength, respectively, and a 30.4% rise in UPV at 56 days, accompanied by a 33.7% increase in drying shrinkage. GGBS treatment yielded moderate mechanical improvements alongside a 25.7% reduction in drying shrinkage. EDS analysis indicated spatially localized reductions in Ca/Si at the treated interfaces relative to the bulk matrix, consistent with localized interfacial modification. Electrostatic dry-powder deposition therefore offers a practical, scalable route to improving interlayer zone quality and converting passive cold joints into engineered transition zones in automated 3DCP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omarov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: