Victims or Architects of Change?

Chuck Leifield

doi:10.66752/1077-5315.8091

April 1, 1993Journal of Extension

Victims or Architects of Change?

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to reframe the understanding of change as a constructive force in program development.
Advocated for a shift from product to process orientation in program design.
Emphasized the necessity for different methodologies in approaching change.
Suggested ongoing adaptation and flexibility in practices.
Proposed that viewing change positively can lead to more effective program delivery.
Identified the need for collective effort in reassessing how programs are perceived.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

We need to see change as a positive force. ...we must change the image of our program from a product to a process orientation. ...it's imperative that we work differently and that we do different work.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Chuck Leifield (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17db4d3fad632b0f9d81ff https://doi.org/10.66752/1077-5315.8091

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Victims or Architects of Change?

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Victims or Architects of Change?

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading