Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares self-metathesis of fatty acids, showing potential for renewable chemicals.
The practicality of self-metathesis of oleic substrates was compared using methyl esters (FAME) and technical oleic acid. Both reactions proved more challenging than those reported for high-purity substrates (≥95% oleic acid or ester) in the literature. Efficient self-metathesis was achieved for both feedstocks with the second-generation Grubbs catalyst (Ru2). For rapeseed-derived FAME, conversion reached ≥70% (based on oleic, linoleic, and linolenic esters). However, the yield of the valuable C18:1 diester (2) did not exceed 40%. In a larger-scale test, the isolated yield was only 36%. The product was contaminated with other metathesis products (e.g., C21:2 diester), which were difficult to separate. In contrast, self-metathesis of 85% technical oleic acid (containing 9.5% linoleic acid) in concentrated n-heptane solution gave better results. An isolated yield of 48% of pure (E)-C18:1 diacid (16) was obtained at a low catalyst loading of 45 ppm Ru2. The improvement resulted from the low solubility of the (E)-diacid, which precipitated and shifted the equilibrium toward product formation. The obtained (E)-C18:1 diacid and its saturated analogue (C18:0 diacid) are promising 100% bio-based building blocks for renewable fine chemicals and biodegradable polymers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gruszczyńska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: