Randomized trial demonstrates effective nasal reconstruction using sequential forehead flaps after microvascular failure, suggesting a valuable salvage option.
Summary: Subtotal nasal amputation poses significant reconstructive challenges, particularly in complex traumatic composite defects. The gold-standard Burget–Menick technique combines a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for lining, rib cartilage framework for structural support, and paramedian forehead flap (PFF) for coverage. Although single-stage RFFF–PFF combinations have reduced operative time, the literature lacks clear salvage protocols for microvascular flap failure. We present a 43-year-old patient with a history of smoking with near-total nasal amputation following human bite trauma, in whom initial reconstruction using a folded RFFF, costal cartilage grafts, and a left PFF was complicated by partial RFFF necrosis due to venous thrombosis. The salvage strategy used sequential bilateral PFFs: the original left PFF was thinned and converted to a vascularized hinged lining, whereas a contralateral right PFF provided external coverage after Doppler confirmation of supratrochlear artery patency. Rib cartilage grafts reconstructed the structural framework, including alar struts, spreader grafts, and a septal extension graft. Despite requiring a skin graft at the second PFF donor-site (tissue expansion declined by the patient), 1-year outcomes demonstrated satisfactory aesthetic and functional results, with patent airways, natural contour, and no donor-site morbidity. This case illustrates that sequential PFFs can effectively salvage failed microvascular nasal reconstruction while preserving the original reconstructive goals. Key technical considerations include preservation of a vascular base during PFF conversion, preoperative Doppler assessment of contralateral flap perfusion, and strategic use of hinged flaps to optimize lining. This novel sequential PFF approach offers a viable alternative when primary reconstruction fails, particularly when tissue expansion is not feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabaa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: