Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Traditional and electronic (PENpages) methods of curriculum development and review, speed the development of 4-H project materials and other curricula. Results indicated that development time and effort was reduced by one-third for large curriculum projects and up to 75% for smaller supplementary materials. The greatest advantage of the electronic method was to get first drafts of text, particularly those that would be widely used and/or controversial into the hands of those who will be using the final product before the bulk of the curriculum investment was expended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Scholl (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: