AbstractA Questionnaire, containing thirty-two descriptions of classroom situations based on all possible combinations of five situational variables, was presented to seventy-eight Introductory Psychology undergraduates. S was asked to rate each situation on a Likert-type scale with regard to Justification for cheating, Urge, Copying, Letting Others Copy, and Guilt. Before rating, Ss were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: one group was told that cheating was prevalent on campus, the other that it was rare. Analyses of variance supported the hypotheses that cheating was significantly greater (p > .001) in those classroom situations in which there were a greater number of negative situational variables and in that group which was told cheating was prevalent. The sole unexpected finding was that feelings of Guilt were significantly less (p > .001) in the more negative classroom situations but, as predicted, did not differ for the two norm groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: