Key result
Electrical cardiometry guidance improves early postoperative hemodynamic stability over conventional monitoring.
Why the study?
Children undergoing corrective CHD surgery risk hemodynamic instability and LCOS, but conventional monitoring relies on static parameters that may inadequately reflect real-time cardiac performance.
Does electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative management reduce low cardiac output syndrome and improve early postoperative outcomes in children undergoing corrective congenital heart disease surgery?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
Does electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative management reduce low cardiac output syndrome and improve early postoperative outcomes in children undergoing corrective congenital heart disease surgery?
Electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative management improves early postoperative hemodynamic stability and metabolic recovery compared to conventional monitoring in children undergoing congenital heart disease surgery.
EC-guided management improves early hemodynamic stability and lactate clearance in pediatric CHD surgery; extends RCT evidence for noninvasive monitoring.
Background and Aims: Children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of perioperative hemodynamic instability and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Conventional monitoring relies on static parameters that may inadequately reflect real-time cardiac performance. Electrical cardiometry (EC) provides continuous, noninvasive assessment of cardiac output and related indices. This study evaluated whether EC-guided perioperative management improves early postoperative outcomes compared with conventional monitoring in pediatric CHD surgery. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 children (0–15 years) undergoing elective corrective CHD surgery were randomized to EC-guided management (Group 1, n = 30) or conventional monitoring (Group 2, n = 30). In Group 1, perioperative fluid and vasoactive therapy were guided by EC-derived parameters, including cardiac index (CI), stroke volume, thoracic fluid content, and stroke volume variation. Group 2 was managed using standard clinical and invasive parameters. The primary outcome was the incidence of LCOS within 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), major adverse cardiac events, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Group 1 demonstrated significantly higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 8, 16, and 24 h postoperatively, faster lactate clearance, and lower VIS during the early postoperative period. CI correlated positively with MAP and urine output and inversely with lactate levels. No mortality occurred. Conclusions: EC-guided perioperative management aids in achieving early postoperative hemodynamic stability and metabolic recovery in children undergoing corrective CHD surgery and represents a valuable noninvasive adjunct to conventional monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thottan et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Congenital heart disease (n=60). Electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative management vs. Conventional monitoring was evaluated on Incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) within 48 h postoperatively. Electrical cardiometry-guided management improved early postoperative hemodynamic stability, including higher mean arterial pressure at 8, 16, and 24 hours, compared to conventional monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: