Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores energy availability’s effects on body composition and well-being in athletes, suggesting complex interactions.
This study aims to explore the impact of energy availability (EA) on body composition, dietary intake, sleep quality, and subjective well-being in free-living Spanish athletes across different sports disciplines. A total of 75 elite and pre-elite athletes (27 women; 24.9±5.9 years) were included. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance, and anthropometry; diet was assessed using dietary recalls and food-frequency questionnaires; sleep quality was determined by a wrist-worn accelerometer; and subjective well-being was evaluated through validated questionnaires. We observed, counter to common hypothesis, that athletes with low energy availability (LEA) showed higher levels of bone-related markers (i.e., bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and Z-score) compared to those with adequate EA (all P<0.05). Despite higher protein intake, athletes with LEA consumed fewer carbohydrates than those with adequate EA (all P<0.05). No relationship was observed between EA and other body composition parameters, sleep quality, or subjective well-being markers (all P>0.05). Overall, these results suggest that factors like metabolic adaptations, activity patterns, and individual behaviors may influence the relationship between EA and athletic performance in real-world settings. LEA's complexities extend beyond simple nutritional deficiencies, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to managing EA and optimizing athletes’ performance and health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rueda-Córdoba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: