Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review explores routine proactive monitoring of TNF-α inhibitor levels in children with IBD, suggesting improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with an onset in childhood is characterized by a more extensive phenotype, a more aggressive clinical course, and a higher risk of long-term complications, including growth retardation, compared to adult-onset disease. While tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are the cornerstone of therapy, achieving sustained remission in children is often hindered by unique pharmacokinetic challenges, such as accelerated drug clearance and a higher propensity for immunogenicity. This review explores the evolving role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), specifically the paradigm shift from reactive to proactive strategies. While proactive TDM remains a subject of debate in adult IBD, emerging pediatric data strongly support its routine use to optimize treatment durability and prevent secondary loss of response. Evidence-based target trough concentrations for pediatric patients are critical for achieving mucosal healing: 8–13 µg/mL at week 6 and >5–7 µg/mL during maintenance for infliximab, and >13–14 µg/mL post-induction for adalimumab. Beyond clinical outcomes, this review emphasizes the economic viability of proactive TDM, which has been shown to reduce total healthcare expenditures by 18–30% by minimizing hospitalizations and avoiding premature treatment switches. By integrating pharmacological data with clinical pathways, proactive TDM serves as an essential tool for personalized medicine, ensuring safer and more cost-effective management of pediatric IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pytrus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: