Key result
Early RASi in hypertensive emergencies linked to ~9-fold higher odds of 2-year renal survival.
Why the study?
Although the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is heavily activated in hypertensive emergency, few reports have characterized the effect of early renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use on kidney function trajectory.
Does early initiation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve renal function and 2-year renal survival in patients with hypertensive emergency?
Cohort (n=49)
No
Does early initiation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve renal function and 2-year renal survival in patients with hypertensive emergency?
Effect estimate: OR 8.75 (95% CI 1.36-56.38)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.9% vs 0.63%
p-value: p=0.036
Early initiation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with hypertensive emergency is safe and associated with improved long-term renal survival and eGFR recovery.
May support early RASi consideration in hypertensive emergencies; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Hypertensive emergency is a critical disease that causes multifaceted sequelae, including end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Although the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAA) system is enormously activated in this disease, there are few reports that attempt to characterize the effect of early use of RAA inhibitors (RASi) on the temporal course of kidney function. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted to clarify whether the early use of RASi during hospitalization offered more favorable benefits on short-term renal function and long-term renal outcomes in patients with hypertensive emergencies. We enrolled a total of 49 patients who visited our medical center with acute severe hypertension and multiple organ dysfunction between April 2012 and August 2020. Upon admission, the patients were treated with intravenous followed by oral antihypertensive drugs, including RASi and Ca channel blockers (CCB). Kidney function as well as other laboratory and clinical parameters were compared between RASi-treated and CCB- treated group over 2 years. Results Antihypertensive treatment effectively reduced blood pressure from 222 ± 28/142 ± 21 to 141 ± 18/87 ± 14 mmHg at 2 weeks and eGFR was gradually restored from 33.2 ± 23.3 to 40.4 ± 22.5 mL/min/1.73m 2 at 1 year. The renal effect of antihypertensive drugs was particularly conspicuous when RASi was started in combination with other conventional antihypertensive drugs at the early period of hospitalization (2nd day [IQR: 1–5.5]) and even in patients with moderately to severely diminished eGFR (< 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) on admission. In contrast, CCB modestly restored eGFR during the observation period. Furthermore, renal survival probabilities were progressively deteriorated in patients who had manifested reduced eGFR (< 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) or massive proteinuria (urine protein/creatinine ≥ 3.5 g/gCr) on admission. Early use of RASi was associated with a favorable 2-year renal survival probability (0.90 [95%CI: 0.77–1.0] vs. 0.63 [95%CI: 0.34–0.92] for RASi ( +) and RASi (-), respectively, p = 0.036) whereas no apparent difference in renal survival was noted for CCB. Conclusions Early use of RASi contributes to the renal functional recovery from acute reduction in eGFR among patients with hypertensive emergencies. Furthermore, RASi offers more favorable effect on 2-year renal survival, compared with CCB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Endo et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hypertensive emergency (n=49). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) vs. No RASi was evaluated on 2-year renal survival probability (OR 8.75, 95% CI 1.36-56.38, p=0.036). Early use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with hypertensive emergencies significantly improved 2-year renal survival probability compared to no RASi use (0.90 vs 0.63, OR 8.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: