Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates impact performance of polyurea-coated composites, suggesting improved durability.
This study aims to systematically evaluate the influence of fiber orientation and polyurea coating configuration on the fracture toughness and post-impact mechanical performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites. Laminates with fiber orientations of 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° were fabricated via the hand lay-up method using a 12-ply E-glass fabric (300 g/m 2 ) with a nominal thickness of 3.5 mm to ensure a representative balance between stiffness, damage tolerance, and manufacturability. A portion of the laminates was coated in single- or double-sided configurations to enhance impact energy dissipation and surface damage resistance. Charpy, low-velocity drop-weight, and three-point bending tests were conducted to evaluate fracture toughness, damage resistance, and post-impact residual load-bearing capacity, while a two-way ANOVA was employed to quantify the effects of fiber orientation and coating type. In terms of performance, double-sided polyurea coatings increased energy absorption by up to 8.3%. Under low-velocity drop-weight impact, these coatings increased peak impact loads by up to 26.1% (reaching 17,141 N) and dramatically reduced the visible surface damage area by approximately 84.8% compared to uncoated laminates. Quantitative results from post-impact flexural tests revealed that double-sided coatings significantly enhanced damage tolerance, limiting strength loss to only 7–9% across all fiber orientations. Specifically, at 0° orientation, double-sided coated specimens retained 91% of their initial load capacity, whereas uncoated specimens suffered a drastic 56% strength reduction. These findings demonstrate that dual-side polyurea coatings markedly improve the residual structural integrity of GFRP composites by effectively mitigating impact-induced damage. Fiber orientation strongly influenced damage initiation and propagation in both Charpy and drop-weight tests; this effect was more pronounced in the Charpy impact response, while absorbed energy under drop-weight impact loading showed limited sensitivity to fiber orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: