Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study evaluates diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spots for vaccine immunity in children, suggesting practical applications in diverse settings.
BACKGROUND: Dried blood spots (DBS) are a minimally invasive alternative to serum for serological surveillance, but pediatric data remain limited, particularly in high-resource settings and in immunocompromised children. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of DBS for assessing vaccine-induced immunity in a pediatric cohort from Madrid, Spain. METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of DBS compared to serum samples in 134 children and adolescents (98 non-immunocompromised, 36 immunocompromised) at La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). IgG antibodies against six vaccine-preventable diseases-diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, and rubella-were quantified using the VirClia® IgG chemiluminescence assay. ROC curves were constructed to establish optimal DBS cut-off values for each pathogen. RESULTS: Using serum cut-offs, DBS showed sensitivities >95% and specificities >85% for all pathogens, except for pertussis, which had a sensitivity of 66.7%, and for rubella and mumps, which had specificities of 62.5% and 44.0%, respectively. Applying optimized DBS cut-offs improved specificity for rubella (81.2%) and mumps (88.0%). In immunocompromised children, sensitivity remained >80% for most pathogens but decreased for mumps (76.0%). Age and time since vaccination did not significantly affect DBS performance. CONCLUSIONS: DBS provide a reliable and practical approach for assessing vaccine-induced immunity in children and adolescents. Their ease of collection and transport make them especially valuable in settings with limited laboratory capacity. Population-specific cut-offs are essential, particularly for immunocompromised groups, to ensure diagnostic accuracy and support global immunization monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez-Molino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: