Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atomistic simulations reveal how surfaces influence dislocation movement in multi-principle element alloys, suggesting new predictive models.
Understanding dislocation mobility is a powerful lever for engineering high-performance alloys because it directly governs mechanical response. Surface-mediated effects are established as decisive regulators of dislocation dynamics, arising from free-surface image forces and locally perturbed stress fields. Yet the mechanisms of surface-affected dislocation motion in multi-principal element alloys (MEAs) remain sparsely explored. Here, atomistic simulations quantify the correlation between edge-dislocation mobility and shear stress in NiCoCr and FeNiCoCr MEAs under periodic boundary condition (PBC) and free-surface boundary condition (FBC). We determine stress–velocity relations and demonstrate a pronounced dependence of mobility on surface state. Under FBCs, intersections with the free surface impose a drag that suppresses mobility and strengthens with increasing velocity. Under PBCs, edge-character mobility partitions into multiple regimes of stable, uniform motion that are separated by bands of forbidden velocity, revealing a non-single-valued dependence of v on τ. Building on these observations, we formulate a dislocation-mobility model that explicitly couples surface effects and recovers the measured trends. This model furnishes a mechanistic basis for predictive theory in NiCoCr and FeNiCoCr MEAs across varied surface states, and it supplies more accurate and reliable inputs to higher-length-scale simulations. The approach clarifies how surface intersections reconfigure local fields to impede glide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: