Evaluation Approaches and Indicator Architectures for Smart Urban Mobility in Smart City Contexts: A Review

Rapid urbanization has intensified congestion, environmental pressures, and transport inequities, thereby increasing interest in Smart Urban Mobility (SUM) as an approach that combines digital technologies, sustainable transport strategies, and data-informed decision-making to respond to these challenges. However, the evaluation of SUM remains fragmented due to the absence of harmonized assessment frameworks and the diversity of methodologies applied across smart city contexts. This study presents a systematic literature review of evaluation approaches and indicator architectures for SUM in smart city contexts. Using a PRISMA-guided screening process, 33 eligible studies were selected from 412 retrieved records. Three main methodological groups were identified: quantitative approaches, multi-criteria decision-making methods, and qualitative or participatory frameworks. A total of 273 indicators were organized into eight factor categories, confirming the multidimensional nature of smart mobility assessment while also revealing limited consistency in indicator selection and application across studies. Across the selected studies, current evaluation practices are increasingly linked to project prioritization, planning, and decision support; however, their effectiveness remains constrained by data inconsistencies, governance fragmentation, and insufficient user inclusion. These findings highlight the need for assessment frameworks that are sufficiently comparable to enable cross-city learning, yet flexible enough to reflect local contexts and institutional realities.