Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reviews mechanisms to report impacts of Extension programs, highlighting funding benefits for decision makers.
This article addresses the need to share Extension program impacts with our constituencies and groups that fund our programs. The article reviews the literature surrounding the need for communicating impacts with decision makers. It also identifies two reporting mechanisms used in one state, County Narrative Reports and the Extension Accountability Reporting System (EARS), that are successfully working to share program impacts with county commissioners, legislators, and the general public. The success of these two reporting systems is based on level or increased funding we have received at the county and state level since the implementation of these two systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karen Lynn Zotz (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: