Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines temperature effects on superplasticity in martensitic steel, suggesting implications for material design.
To elucidate the evolution of dynamic recrystallization (DRX) mechanisms in cold-worked Cr4Mo4Ni4V martensitic steel, tensile tests were conducted on a 50% cold-deformed material at 600–850 °C at a fixed strain rate of 0.001 s−1, combined with systematic microstructural characterization. Under this specific strain rate, the results reveal a temperature-dependent transition from continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) to discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (DDRX). At 600 °C, CDRX dominates, producing recrystallized grains with orientations close to the parent matrix and relatively strong texture. At 750 °C, CDRX and DDRX coexist, while DDRX is significantly enhanced, characterized by grain boundary nucleation and random orientations, leading to a marked reduction in texture intensity; simultaneously, the fraction of recrystallized grains and high-angle grain boundaries reaches a maximum. At 850 °C, DDRX becomes dominant. This transition in DRX mechanism governs the high-temperature plasticity, with optimal superplasticity achieved at 800 °C, corresponding to an elongation of 748%. Cavities are primarily initiated at carbide/matrix interfaces, and their growth and coalescence dominate the fracture process. These findings clarify the temperature-dependent DRX evolution and its role in regulating superplasticity, providing guidance for microstructure design and superplastic forming of martensitic steels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: