Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncovers the principles behind quantum tunneling phenomena and topology influence.
Based on the PFUSRC 45° triple coaxial bicone topology, cone-prism interlayer domain, and universal rigid axiom system, this paper reconstructs the ontological origin and dynamic framework of quantum tunneling. We strictly distinguish the 4D global space from the cone-prism interlayer quasi-void domain, and point out that quantum tunneling is not “penetration through a barrier” in ordinary space, but a directional propagation of wavefunctions along topological vertices inside the interlayer. This paper introduces the passive-autonomous behavior dichotomy into tunneling theory: passive influence is determined by interlayer geometry, vertex position, and boundary constraints; autonomous behavior originates from coupling-zero perturbations and ζ-element order control, manifesting as intrabarrier recollision, path selection, symmetry breaking, and cooperative tunneling of massive clusters. Recent authoritative experiments show that all anomalous tunneling phenomena can be uniformly explained as responses to conforming or inverse primordial bicone topology. When the structure is inverse to the optimal topology, obvious anomalies appear, which are defined as inverse primordial cone behaviors. The theory is self-consistent, falsifiable, and supported by reliable experimental evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenmin Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: