The syntactic rule of Restructuring explains the syntactic properties of so-called ‘Clitic Climbing’ sentences in Italian. However, Restructuring alone fails to account for the semantic properties of such sentences. This paper argues that lexical governance of Restructuring is inadequate. Instead, a syntactic rule operating freely whenever its structural description is met, and followed by semantic interpretation rules, not only adequately but insightfully handles the data. A crucial claim is that the derived structure of the verbal complex in a restructured sentence is identical to that of a complex of auxiliary + past participle, so that the same semantic interpretation rules apply to both.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donna Jo Napoli (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: