Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pragmatized examination of Kant's beauty concepts reveals insights about nature and culture significance.
Beauty, in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment, is the object of a judgment grounded solely upon the subjects’ feeling of pleasure, which, however, claims universal validity. In this paper I begin with an interpretation of such pleasure-based subjective universality as the most emblematic form of the human capacity for orientation in the realm of the contingent (1) and I then pursue this interpretation through Kant’s distinction between «free» and «adherent» beauty (2). Afterward, I develop this distinction in the direction of a pragmatist, deflationary understanding of the nature/culture divide (3), instantiating and substantiating it in the conclusion through a brief discussion of «pleasure gardens» in Kant (4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alberto L. Siani (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: