Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates thermoelectric performance in copper-based chalcogenides, suggesting improved material design methods.
Copper‐based chalcogenides Cu 2− x (S, Se) offer a more cost‐effective alternative to commercial tellurium‐based thermoelectric materials. However, enhancing their ZT values is constrained by intrinsically complex phase structures. The present study proposes a three‐tier hierarchical strategy that integrates phase regulation, chemical bonding engineering, and band engineering to decouple electronic and thermal transport. Phase regulation via Se 2− alloying increases configurational entropy and stabilizes a high‐symmetry hexagonal/cubic multiphase coexistence, thereby suppressing detrimental low‐temperature phases and inducing beneficial valence‐band flattening. In 3+ doping weakens Cu─S/Se bonding by enhancing antibonding states, inducing lattice softening and strengthening superionic behavior, while introducing impurity levels that increase the density‐of‐states effective mass to 2.5 m e and boost the Seebeck coefficient to 131 µV K −1 at 323 K. Further integration of multiscale defects, such as point defects, dislocations, interfaces, and nanopores, enables Cu 1.94 In 0.01 S 0.3 Se 0.7 to achieve a power factor of 11.2 µW cm −1 K −2 and an ultralow lattice thermal conductivity of 0.27 W m −1 K −1 , yielding a peak ZT of 1.45 at 773 K. Notably, the ZT values in the 523–773 K range exceed those of most previously reported Cu‐based chalcogenides. The three‐tier hierarchical “phase‐bond‐band” framework provides a useful guideline for designing high‐performance chalcogenide thermoelectric materials with complex phase structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: