Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discussion highlights the importance of addressing reviewer feedback, promoting engagement with scholarly articles.
"Responding to JOE Reviews" explains that ignoring reviewers' comments and suggestions is not an option and that there are many ways to respond to them. "June JOE" highlights two of the many good articles in this issue, refers to an earlier article, points to one to come, and reiterates their message.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Hoelscher (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: