Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This theoretical framework explores energy conservation in spacetime, suggesting new insights into cosmological phenomena.
Part I We propose a self-consistent extension of relativistic spacetime based on a dual-foliation structure, in which two temporal coordinates coexist and interact geometrically. The model introduces a coherence parameter χ(x) ∈ [0,1], which quantifies the degree of structural synchronisation between two temporal foliations and determines the local participation of each foliation in the effective metric: gₑff = χ g₍₁₎ + (1 − χ) g₍₂₎. Energy–momentum is conserved globally, but local conservation may be violated in a controlled way via an inter-foliation current Jᵐᵘ, leading to effective source terms in the Einstein equations. Remarkably, when g₍₂₎ exhibits a weak intrinsic expansion, the framework reproduces an accelerated cosmological scale factor a(t) without invoking dark energy or a cosmological constant. Furthermore, quantum-like superposition of states emerges naturally as linear combinations of configurations across foliations, while measurement-like transitions correspond to sharp gradients in χ. The model remains compatible with all classical tests of general relativity in the χ ≈ 1 limit and introduces no new fundamental constants. Though speculative, it is mathematically elementary and falsifiable: deviations in gravitational redshift, cosmic shear, or quantum interference under strong spacetime curvature could provide observational signatures. This approach suggests that temporal redundancy—and the coherence-dependent emergence of physical laws—may underlie several persistent anomalies in modern physics. Crucially, the effective gravitational coupling Gₑff is not time-dependent, but coherence-dependent—a distinction that resolves apparent tensions with local tests of gravity while allowing for cosmological variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. De Paz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: