Prospective study finds a biomarker panel predicts response to anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting improved treatment strategies.
Background/Objectives: Response to TNF inhibitors in RA remains heterogeneous and reliable predictors of treatment response are still lacking. Biomarker-based stratification may improve therapeutic decision-making and aligns with the emerging paradigm of precision medicine. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study including 64 biologic-naïve patients with active RA being inadequately controlled by csDMARDs. All patients initiated anti-TNF therapy and were followed for 12 months. Clinical response was assessed at 6 and 12 months using EULAR response criteria based on DAS28-CRP. Baseline serum levels of classical biomarkers (RF type IgM, RF type IgA, anti-CCP) and additional biomarkers (anti-MCV,14-3-3η protein, COMP) were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of treatment response. Results: At 6 months, 7 patients were classified as non-responders, 38 as moderate responders, and 19 as good responders Lower baseline levels of RF isotypes, anti-CCP antibodies, 14-3-3η protein, and COMP were associated with favorable clinical response at 6 months. Baseline anti-CCP and 14-3-3η protein levels emerged as significant predictors in univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression yielded a predictive model incorporating anti-CCP, 14-3-3η protein, and COMP, achieving an overall prediction accuracy of 89.1%. At 12 months, baseline RF isotypes remained associated with treatment response, whereas the predictive value of other biomarkers diminished. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated significant reductions mainly for classical autoantibody levels under anti-TNF α inhibitors. Conclusions: A combined serum biomarker panel may support early prediction of response to anti-TNF therapy in RA. These findings highlight the potential of integrated biomarker-based stratification to optimize therapeutic decisions and support the implementation of precision medicine approaches in RA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavrilă et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: