Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical framework categorizes constant variations, highlighting implications for metrology and physical laws.
The stability of fundamental physical constants underpins modern physics, yet distinguishing their intrinsic time variation from systemic drifts in measurement reference frames remains a critical metrological challenge, particularly following the 2019 redefinition of the SI base units. This work establishes a generalized dimensional analysis framework to categorize constant variations into three mathematically constrained scenarios. First, we demonstrate that if dimensionless constants remain invariant, a rigid algebraic constraint binds the co-variation of dimensionful parameters, preserving the structure of physical laws. Second, we formalize the standard scenario where an observed variation in a single dimensionless constant maps directly to its corresponding non-reference dimensionful counterpart. Crucially, our third scenario reveals that a drift in a defined SI reference standard (e.g., c, h, or e) cannot occur in isolation; instead, it triggers a predictable, correlated "cascading" variation pattern across multiple dimensionless observables. By deriving specific sensitivity exponents for these covariant patterns, this framework provides a diagnostic metrological signature. This signature enables the discrimination between a localized experimental anomaly in a non-reference parameter and a systemic shift originating from the foundational reference standards themselves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriele D’Agostino (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: