Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores lunar power system resilience in lunar bases, indicating a need for topology-focused design.
Lunar power system design is overwhelmingly capacity-centric: studies select generation technologies (solar, nuclear, hybrid) and size storage against eclipse duration, treating network topology as a secondary engineering detail. This structural silence persists despite the well-established result from terrestrial power systems that network topology — independent of total capacity — determines qualitatively different resilience and scalability regimes. We develop a topology-centric framework for lunar base energy systems, introduce a Named Binary distinguishing Capacity-Centric Energy Design (CCED) from Topology-Centric Energy Regime Design (TCERD), and derive the survivability metric S(a) and scalability metric K(a) as functions of network architecture rather than installed capacity. We formalise three archetypal energy regimes — Centralised Core (CEN), Distributed Microgrids (DMG), and Hybrid Core-plus-Microgrids (HYB) — and prove the existence of three topological threshold conditions: a redundancy threshold R* (minimum independent feeder count for life-critical loads), an islandability threshold I* (minimum local storage fraction for autonomous zone operation), and a growth threshold G* (maximum load density at which centralised architectures remain non-fragile). We prove non-equivalence at equal capacity: two architectures with identical total generation and storage can differ by more than one order of magnitude in single-fault survivability S(a) as a function of topology alone. We connect the framework to the Internal-Geometry Threshold (IGT) theory of self-referentially self-maintaining systems, derive the minimum external reference condition for stable power maintenance, confirm structural invariance across terrestrial microgrids, data centre power architectures, and maritime power systems, and specify a fully pre-registerable Collapse Counter-Scenario. The framework is immediately applicable to Artemis programme base planning and to commercial lunar facility design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Caetano de Mattos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: