Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines psychological effects of glass skin ideal in young social media users, suggesting educational needs for dermatologists.
Objectives: Social media platforms amplify idealized beauty norms such as the “glass skin” trend, emphasizing flawless, poreless, luminous skin. These digital esthetics may conflict with physiological skin variations, potentially undermining body image and well-being. We investigated the psychological and behavioral impact of exposure to the glass skin ideal among young social media users and examined expectations toward dermatologists in counteracting misinformation. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted between February and April 2025 among social media users aged 15–34 years. The 25-item questionnaire assessed skin characteristics, exposure to glass skin content, psychological impact using a composite Likert-based score, and related behaviors. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26. Results: A total of 250 participants were included, with a mean age of 22.6 ± 4.8 years and a female predominance of 94%. Exposure to the glass skin ideal was reported by 76%. Although 66% considered it physiologically unrealistic, 29% attempted trend-related routines and 22% experienced frustration when results were not achieved. Overall, 76% showed moderate to high psychological impact, including negative self-image in 63% and reduced self-confidence or anxiety in 53%. Younger participants were significantly more affected than older ones, 42% versus 15%, p < 0.001. Despite greater trust in dermatologists, 65% reported following influencer advice, and 75% expressed the need for a stronger dermatologists’ presence on social media. Conclusion: The glass skin ideal is associated with substantial psychological and behavioral effects in young social media users. Dermatologists should address digitally shaped expectations through education and psychodermatologic awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakkali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: