Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved robustness in graph neural networks, suggesting a better defense against attacks.
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are highly effective on relational data, yet their performance degrades sharply when graph topology is poisoned before training. Existing defenses usually assume a fixed attack pattern and a fixed graph structure, which makes them brittle when the poisoned graph changes across attacks, perturbation budgets, or deployment conditions. We propose GADD, a game-inspired adversarial distillation framework for robust graph defense. GADD first constructs multiple positive and negative graph views through a homophily-aware graph sampling scheme, allowing the model to learn from both purified and high-risk subgraphs. It then trains a heterogeneous group of student GNNs online, where each student receives global class-distribution knowledge from its peers and local structural knowledge through an adversarial cyclic distillation objective. Finally, GADD replaces uniform ensembling with an entropy-regularized adaptive aggregation rule that assigns graph-adaptive weights according to confidence and inter-model agreement. On Cora, CiteSeer, and PubMed, GADD consistently improves robustness against both Meta and Nettack attacks while preserving clean accuracy. Under the strongest Meta and Nettack settings in the main benchmark, GADD improves the best competing baseline by up to 2.99 and 3.42 percentage points, respectively. Additional ablations show that graph sampling, adversarial distillation, and adaptive aggregation all contribute materially to the final robustness gains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: