Using Correspondence Study

Joan S. Thomson

doi:10.66752/1077-5315.7764

October 1, 1993Journal of Extension

Using Correspondence Study

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The research aims to evaluate the impact of correspondence-based instruction compared to face-to-face methods in graduate education.
Compared time spent on face-to-face and correspondence instruction
Focused on graduate students and Extension support personnel
Considered the flexibility and engagement of the educational methods
No significant difference in time spent on both instruction methods
Correspondence instruction allowed for greater flexibility and updated information access
Promoted innovative involvement of graduate and support personnel

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Investigates the effectiveness of correspondence-based instruction in graduate education, suggesting flexible engagement for students.

Abstract

Time spent developing either face-to-face or correspondence-based inservices may not differ significantly. However, correspondence-based instruction offers the potential to involve graduate students and Extension support personnel in new ways. From the specialist's perspective, this educational method allowed him to provide agents with the most up-to-date information, yet maximized their flexibility in its study and use.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Joan S. Thomson (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17de013fad632b0f9da869 https://doi.org/10.66752/1077-5315.7764

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Using Correspondence Study

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Using Correspondence Study

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading