Key result
Systematic review protocol evaluates comparative effectiveness of anti-inflammatory therapies for MACE reduction in ASCVD.
Why the study?
Inflammation is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but comparative evidence regarding the efficacy of various anti-inflammatory treatment options is lacking.
Do anti-inflammatory therapies reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients with known coronary artery disease compared to placebo or other anti-inflammatory agents?
Systematic Review
Do anti-inflammatory therapies reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients with known coronary artery disease compared to placebo or other anti-inflammatory agents?
This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of various anti-inflammatory therapies for preventing cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Protocol for network meta-analysis of anti-inflammatory therapies in ASCVD; will clarify comparative effectiveness and safety but leaves practice unchanged until completed.
Introduction Inflammation is emerging as an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and has been a recent target for many novel therapeutic agents. However, comparative evidence regarding efficacy of these anti-inflammatory treatment options is currently lacking. Methods and analysis This systematic review will include randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of anti-inflammatory agents on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with known cardiovascular disease. Studies will be retrieved from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as clinical trial registry websites, Europe PMC and conference abstract handsearching. No publication date or language restrictions will be imposed. Eligible interventions must have some component of anti-inflammatory agent. These include (but are not limited to): non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, prednisone, methotrexate, canakinumab, pexelizumab, anakinra, succinobucol, losmapimod, inclacumab, atreleuton, LP-PLA 2 (darapladib) and sPLA 2 (varespladib). The primary outcomes will include major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and each individual component of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death). Key secondary outcomes will include unstable angina, heart failure, all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest and revascularisation. Screening, inclusion, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Network meta-analysis based on the random effects model will be conducted to compare treatment effects both directly and indirectly. The quality of the evidence will be assessed with appropriate tools including the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation profiler or Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022303289.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boczar et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Anti-inflammatory agents vs. Placebo or other anti-inflammatory therapies was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and its individual components (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death). Anti-inflammatory therapies will be evaluated for their comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiac events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease as part of this systematic review protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: