Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To test the depression-distortion hypothesis in pediatric type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a sample of 187 youth with type 1 diabetes, caregivers completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI): parent proxy report. Youth completed the CDI. To test whether caregiver depressive symptoms (CES-D) moderated the proxy report of youth depressive symptoms (CDI:P), the CDI, CES-D, and their interactions were entered as predictors in to a regression analysis. RESULTS: The regression was significant, F (8,178) = 9.26, p <.0001, R(2) =.29, and all three variables were significant predictors. Post-hoc probing of the interaction showed that caregivers with high CES-D scores reported high levels of youth depressive symptoms at both high and low levels of youth-reported depressive symptoms. In contrast, caregivers with low CES-D scores reported similar levels as the youth. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the depression-distortion hypothesis in a pediatric chronic disease sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korey K. Hood (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: