Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We discuss the prefix encoding of a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Q</tex> -ary source <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">(Q ≥ 2)</tex> into an <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</tex> -symbol channel alphabet with <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L ≥ Q</tex> . We present an optimal encoding scheme that minimizes the expected cost per symbol in the case of equally probable source symbols and arbitrary channel symbol costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lempel et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: