Key result
A 10-week aerobic training program significantly increased mean workload (from 93.8 to 129.5 W, p<0.001) and HR (from 130.2 to 139.2 bpm, p<0.001) while Borg-scores remained stable.
Why the study?
Can heart rate be accurately predicted based on the Borg-scale for perceived exertion in patients with chronic low back pain undergoing an aerobic training programme?
Observational (n=99)
Can heart rate be accurately predicted based on the Borg-scale for perceived exertion in patients with chronic low back pain undergoing an aerobic training programme?
The Borg-scale combined with heart rate measurement provides a relevant and efficient method for guiding aerobic training in patients with chronic low back pain.
May support combined Borg-HR monitoring for aerobic training in chronic low back pain; leaves open prospective validation of Borg-predicted HR.
PURPOSE: Firstly, to examine whether heart rate (HR) can be predicted based on the Borg-scale for perceived exertion in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and secondly, to assess changes in HR, Borg-scores and workload to study the relevance of a stepwise increase of workload based on the Borg-score and HR. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with CLBP and a mean disability-score (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) of 13.8 (SD = 3.7) participated in a 10-week aerobic training programme (20 min, 3 times/week). HR, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and workload were monitored. Prior to treatment, patients completed questionnaires on pain, disability, and several psychological factors (catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and depression). RESULTS: The original Borg-equation (i.e. 'HR = Borg x 10') appears accurate in predicting HR on a group-level. Pain-related and psychological factors were not significantly related to the accuracy of the Borg equation. Whereas mean workload increased significantly (from 93.8 (SD = 29.9) to 129.5 W (SD = 39.7), p < 0.001) throughout the training programme, HR increased only slightly (from 130.2 (SD = 13.5) to 139.2 (SD = 13.9) bpm; p < 0.001) and Borg-scores remained stable (from 13.2 (SD = 1.9) to 13.3 (SD = 1.8); p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The capability of the Borg-scale to accurately predict HR appears moderate. However combined with measuring HR, it results in a relevant and efficient method for training CLBP patients in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demoulin et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Chronic low back pain (n=99). Aerobic training programme was evaluated on Accuracy of Borg-equation in predicting HR and changes in HR, Borg-scores, and workload. A 10-week aerobic training program significantly increased mean workload (from 93.8 to 129.5 W, p<0.001) and HR (from 130.2 to 139.2 bpm, p<0.001) while Borg-scores remained stable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: