Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article first sets out the principles of neoclassical microeconomic analysis and examines the advances in our understanding of individual giving to charitable organizations achieved within this framework of analysis. It then turns to sociology and considers alternative conceptions of sociological analysis, especially rational-action theories and the qualitative tradition. The contribution of these to our understanding of charitable giving is explored. The article concludes that rational-choice sociology can complement economic analyses in two ways but that qualitative sociology is contradictory to the economic approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Halfpenny (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: