Key result
Public network care is linked to an ~87% lower rate of DES use for STEMI.
Why the study?
Diabetic patients with STEMI have high restenosis rates and unfavorable outcomes, making DES indicated, but rates of DES use across public and private health networks were unclear.
Does the type of healthcare network (public vs private) affect the rate of drug-eluting stent use in STEMI patients, particularly diabetics?
Cross-Sectional (n=707)
Yes
Does the type of healthcare network (public vs private) affect the rate of drug-eluting stent use in STEMI patients, particularly diabetics?
There is a significant disparity in the use of drug-eluting stents for STEMI patients, particularly diabetics, between public and private healthcare networks in Brazil, highlighting a failure to follow guideline recommendations in the public system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Marked disparity in drug-eluting stent use for STEMI between public and private networks; leaves open equity questions and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty (PA) with placement of either bare metal or drug-eluting stents (DES) represents the main strategy in the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Diabetic patients, however, represent a special population in STEMI, with high rates of restenosis and unfavorable clinical outcomes, and with the use of DES, level of evidence A and indication class II, being indicated to reduce these damages. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the DES rate of use in patients with STEMI and in the subgroup of diabetics assisted in the public versus private health network in Sergipe. METHODS: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach using the data from the VICTIM Register. These were collected in the only four hospitals with capacity to perform PA in Sergipe, from December 2014 to March 2017. RESULTS: A total of 707 patients diagnosed with STEMI were evaluated, of which 589 were attended at SUS and 118 at the private network. The use of DES in PA was lower in SUS compared to the private network in both the total sample (10.5% vs 82.4%, p<0.001) and in subgroup diabetic patients (8.7% vs 90.6%, p < 0.001), respectively. In all hypotheses tested, the level of significance was 5% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals a disparity in the use of DES during the performance of PA between the public and private network, both in the total sample and the subgroup for diabetics, with lower rates for SUS users, demonstrating the challenges that need to be overcome in order to achieve quality improvements of the services provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=707). Public healthcare network (SUS) vs. Private healthcare network was evaluated on Rate of drug-eluting stent (DES) use in primary angioplasty (p=<0.001). The use of drug-eluting stents during primary angioplasty for STEMI was significantly lower in the public healthcare network compared to the private network (10.5% vs 82.4%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: