Key result
GPT-4 improves readability of cardiac amyloidosis patient materials by ~3 grade levels while maintaining accuracy.
Why the study?
Patient education materials for cardiac amyloidosis often exceed the AMA-recommended 6th-grade reading level, and GPT-4 may enhance their readability.
Does GPT-4 improve the readability of patient education materials for cardiac amyloidosis compared to original institutional materials?
Observational (n=86)
Does GPT-4 improve the readability of patient education materials for cardiac amyloidosis compared to original institutional materials?
GPT-4 significantly improves the readability of online patient education materials for cardiac amyloidosis while maintaining accuracy and potentially enhancing comprehensiveness.
May support GPT-4 revision of cardiac amyloidosis materials; leaves open effects on comprehension and outcomes.
Background Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a rare, progressive condition that requires complex management, highlighting the importance of accessible and understandable patient education materials (PEMs). The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends that PEMs be written at or below a 6th-grade reading level; however, PEMs for CA often exceed this recommendation. GPT-4, a large language model (LLM), is increasingly being studied for its ability to enhance PEM readability. Materials and Methods Institutional PEMs were sourced from the websites of the top 10 institutions ranked by the 2022-2023 US News & World Report for “Best Hospitals for Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Surgery.” GPT-4 (version updated 20 July 2023) was prompted with “please explain the following in simpler terms” along with each institutional PEM to produce revised responses. The readability of both the institutional and GPT-4 revised PEMs was evaluated using validated readability formulas through readable.com. Finally, a board-certified cardiologist reviewed institutional and revised PEMs to assess for changes in accuracy and comprehensiveness. Results A total of 86 PEMs were analyzed. None of the institutional PEMs met the recommended 6th-grade reading level and had a median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) of 10.9 (high school freshman; IQR: 9.2, 12.6, p<0.001). In comparison, GPT-4 revised PEMs reduced the median FKGL to 7.8 (seventh grade; IQR: 7.0, 8.8, p<0.001), with 14/86 (16.3%) achieving at least a 6th-grade reading level. All GPT-4 revised PEMs 86/86 (100%) were accurate after review, with 9/86 (10.5%) deemed more comprehensive and 3/86 (3.5%) deemed less comprehensive than the institutional materials. Conclusions GPT-4 significantly improved the readability of institutional PEMs for CA while maintaining accuracy and, in some cases, enhancing comprehensiveness. These findings underscore the potential of LLMs to bridge health literacy gaps by simplifying complex medical information without compromising content integrity. However, further research is needed to validate our findings and assess patient comprehension, real-world efficacy, and the impact of AI-driven education on clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haquang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiac Amyloidosis (n=86). GPT-4 revision vs. Original institutional patient education materials was evaluated on Median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) (p=<0.001). GPT-4 significantly improved the readability of institutional patient education materials for cardiac amyloidosis, reducing the median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level from 10.9 to 7.8 while maintaining accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: