Randomized trial demonstrates improved readability in educational materials for retina patients, suggesting effective use of AI tools.
Purpose: To determine whether large language models (LLMs) can be harnessed to improve the readability of educational material for retina patients. Methods: Forty-one documents (fact sheets presented in portable document format), each representing a vitreoretinal condition, from the American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) Retina Health Fact Sheets website, were downloaded in November of 2024. The multimodal LLM Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) was accessed through ChatGPT to generate patient education material on the same 41 vitreoretinal conditions. The model was then prompted to adjust the texts to a sixth-grade reading level. The text outputs for each of the 41 conditions were then analyzed through a readability calculator, and the Average Reading Level Consensus Calc (ARLCalc) score, a normalized average of 8 validated readability formulas that reflect a consensus readability grade level of the text, was recorded. Results: The ARLCalc scores for the ASRS Fact Sheet, GPT-4 Response, GPT-4 Enhanced, and ASRS Enhanced responses were 12.85 (± 0.89), 12.37 (± 0.97), 8.66 (± 0.87), and 9.37 (± 1.09), respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the 4 groups ( P < .001). Conclusions: LLMs may be used as a tool to improve the readability of patient-facing text. Patient education material created by specialty-trained authorship committees remains the gold standard for providing accurate medical information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wibbelsman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: