Key result
LV endocardial lead placement succeeds without acute complications in 5 patients, yielding significant symptomatic improvement.
Why the study?
Conventional left ventricular lead placement is not always possible due to anatomic and technical limitations.
Does LV endocardial lead placement provide a safe and viable alternative for resynchronization therapy in patients with unsuccessful coronary sinus lead placements and contraindications to epicardial leads?
Case Report (n=5)
Does LV endocardial lead placement provide a safe and viable alternative for resynchronization therapy in patients with unsuccessful coronary sinus lead placements and contraindications to epicardial leads?
LV endocardial lead placement via the interatrial septum is a feasible and safe alternative for cardiac resynchronization therapy in highly selected patients who have failed conventional approaches.
Objectives: Describe an alternative to conventional LV lead placement. Background: Conventional left ventricular (LV) lead placement is not always possible due to anatomic and technical limitations. In selected patients LV endocardial lead placement is a viable alternative. Methods: Five patients on warfarin with unsuccessful coronary sinus lead placements and contraindications to epicardial lead placement elected to undergo addition of an LV endocardial lead. The left ventricle was accessed through the interatrial septum via a combined superior and inferior approach resulting in an active fix lead placed on the LV endocardial surface. Results: All patients underwent successful LV endocardial lead placement. There were no acute procedural complications. Two patients died 2 years following the procedure from unrelated causes. The other patients were alive and well at a mean follow up of 2.8 years, with significant symptomatic improvement and no evidence of cardioembolic complications. Conclusions: The placement of LV endocardial leads is a viable alternative in highly selected patients with limited options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Przybylowicz et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Need for resynchronization therapy (n=5). Left ventricular endocardial lead placement was evaluated on Successful LV endocardial lead placement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: