Key result
Electroanatomical mapping successfully guided transseptal endocardial LV lead implantation in all 4 patients, maintaining stable electrical parameters over 18.3 months without complications.
Why the study?
Does electroanatomical mapping facilitate successful transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation in CRT patients with failed standard approaches?
Population
4 patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy who had unsuccessful transvenous implantation or…
Design
Case_series
Follow-up
mean 18.3 months
Authors
Loading...
May offer an option for CRT patients with failed standard LV leads; hypothesis-generating case series requiring prospective validation.
Case Report (n=4)
Does electroanatomical mapping facilitate successful transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation in CRT patients with failed standard approaches?
Electroanatomical mapping is a feasible and useful tool to guide transseptal endocardial LV lead implantation and identify optimal lead positions in CRT patients when standard approaches fail.
Kutyifa et al. (2011) conducted a case report in Unsuccessful transvenous implantation or epicardial LV lead dysfunction in CRT patients (n=4). Electroanatomical mapping during transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation was evaluated on Successful implantation and stable electrical parameters. Electroanatomical mapping successfully guided transseptal endocardial LV lead implantation in all 4 patients, maintaining stable electrical parameters over 18.3 months without complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: