Key result
Intracoronary propranolol added to eptifibatide during PCI significantly reduced the 30-day composite of death, MI, or urgent revascularization compared to placebo (13.5% vs 22.5%; P=0.018).
Why the study?
Does intracoronary propranolol reduce the composite of death, MI, or urgent target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI with background eptifibatide?
RCT (n=400)
Double-blind
randomized
Does intracoronary propranolol reduce the composite of death, MI, or urgent target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI with background eptifibatide?
Intracoronary propranolol added to eptifibatide during PCI significantly reduces post-procedural MI and improves short- and long-term clinical outcomes.
Supports adjunctive intracoronary propranolol with eptifibatide in PCI; extends randomized evidence for periprocedural beta-blockade.
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the hypothesis that intracoronary (IC) propranolol improves clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when used with background Gp IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that administration of a relatively large weight-based IC dose of the beta blocker propranolol before PCI decreases the incidence of post-PCI myocardial infarction (MI) and improves short- and long-term outcome. It has previously been shown that administration of a Gp IIb/IIIa receptor blocker decreases post-PCI MI and improves short- and long-term clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI (n = 400) were randomized in a prospective double-blind fashion to IC propranolol (n = 200) or placebo (n = 200) with eptifibatide administered to all the patients. Myocardial isoform of creatine kinase was measured during the first 24 hr and clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: MI after PCI was seen in 21.5% of placebo and 12.5% of propranolol patients (relative risk reduction 0.42; 95%CI 0.09, 0.63; P = 0.016). At 30 days, the composite end point of death, post-procedural MI, urgent target lesion revascularization, or MI after index hospitalization occurred in 22.5% of placebo vs. 13.5% of propranolol patients (risk reduction 0.43; 95%CI 0.08, 0.65; P = 0.018). Similar results were observed at 1 year with adverse outcomes in 21.5% of propranolol and 32.5% of placebo patients (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: IC propranolol administration with the background Gp IIb/IIIa receptor blockade significantly reduces the incidence of post-PCI MI and improves the short- and long-term clinical outcome when compared with a Gp IIb/IIIa blocker alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uretsky et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=400). Intracoronary propranolol + eptifibatide vs. Placebo + eptifibatide was evaluated on Composite of death, post-procedural MI, urgent target lesion revascularization, or MI after index hospitalization at 30 days (Risk reduction 0.43, 95% CI 0.08, 0.65, p=0.018). Intracoronary propranolol added to eptifibatide during PCI significantly reduced the 30-day composite of death, MI, or urgent revascularization compared to placebo (13.5% vs 22.5%; P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: