Why the study?
Does adding a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor to clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin reduce death, MI, or target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
Does adding a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor to clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin reduce death, MI, or target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
In patients undergoing PCI pretreated with clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin, the addition of a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor does not reduce ischemic outcomes but increases bleeding.
Glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when added to aspirin and heparin. However, the benefits of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients pretreated with clopidogrel are less clear. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of adding a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor to clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin before PCI. Five trials were identified via electronic searches of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The studies randomized a total of 5303 patients; 2654 received a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Two trials examined patients with acute coronary syndromes and 3 examined patients undergoing elective PCI. Loading doses of clopidogrel ranged from 375 to 600 mg. Follow-up ranged from 30 days to 1 year.Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition did not reduce the endpoints of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.22, P = 0.35 for death; OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.69-1.08, P = 0.19 for MI; and OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.81-1.15, P = 0.68 for target vessel revascularization). Analyses restricted to acute coronary syndromes trials yielded similar results (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.33-1.48, P = 0.35 for death; OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.59-1.03, P = 0.08 for MI). Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition increased major and minor bleeding (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.04-1.75, P = 0.02) driven by use of abciximab. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pannu et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: