Introduction: This study addresses issues in students’ academic writing by proposing peer feedback as a strategy to improve university students’ advanced (B1 - B2) academic writing skills. The intervention took place over a sixteen-week course at a private university in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Method: An action research was conducted, integrating quantitative (pre- and post-tests) and qualitative (questionnaire) instruments to determine if sixty freshman university students would improve their writing skills in terms of structure, fluency, and accuracy. Results: Students demonstrated improvement in their writing, with a Cohen’s d = 0.39. Students’ feedback reported both benefits and challenges in providing peer feedback. Conclusions: Despite limitations for both students and the teacher, peer feedback can be considered a strategy to raise students’ awareness of their own writing errors at advanced level. Other EFL teachers and coordinators can gain new insights from this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cañizares et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: