Key result
Cytological atypia predicts ~15-fold greater odds of MDM2 amplification in lipomatous tumors.
Why the study?
Well-differentiated liposarcoma shares overlapping features with benign lipoma, creating a need to identify predictors of MDM2 amplification to better inform decisions for molecular testing.
What are the clinical, radiological, and histological predictors of MDM2 amplification in lipomatous tumours?
Cohort (n=173)
No
What are the clinical, radiological, and histological predictors of MDM2 amplification in lipomatous tumours?
Effect estimate: OR 15.03 (95% CI 3.07-73.68)
p-value: p=<0.001
Clinical, radiological, and histological features such as age ≥60 years, size ≥15cm, thick septa on MRI, and cytological atypia strongly predict MDM2 amplification in lipomatous tumors, helping guide the need for molecular testing.
May guide selective MDM2 testing in lipomatous tumors; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Background: Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma (WDLPS) is the most common subtype of malignant lipomatous tumours. This low-grade neoplasm carries a risk of local recurrence and dedifferentiation into higher-grade subtypes, and therefore requires aggressive treatment with wide local excision and neoadjuvant radiotherapy. WDLPS, however, shares overlapping features with its benign counterpart, lipoma. Diagnostically challenging cases can be resolved with molecular testing for Mouse Double Minute 2 (MDM2) amplification, which is found in almost all WDLPS. This study aimed to determine the predictors of MDM2 amplification to better inform the decision for tumours to undergo molecular testing. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 173 lipomatous tumours. Demographic, clinical, radiology and pathology data were obtained from institutional records. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the features of lipomatous tumours that correlate with MDM2 amplification. The relative strength of the associations between predictor variables and MDM2 amplification were measured via derivation of coefficients of determination (Pseudo-R2). Results: The significant predictors of MDM2 amplification were age of diagnosis ≥60 years (odds ratio (OR)=25.71; 95% confidence interval (CI)=4.47- 148.02); size ≥15cm (OR=11.68; 95% CI=2.70-50.59); presence of thick septa (OR=78.13; 95% CI=3.23-1890.71) on MRI; variable cell morphology (OR=22.19; 95% CI=4.03-122.20); and cytological atypia (OR=15.03; 95% CI=3.07-73.68). Conclusion: Molecular testing for MDM2 amplification should be considered for tumours 15cm or greater, in patients aged 60 years or older, with thick septa on MRI, even in the absence of concerning histological features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Lipomatous tumours (Lipoma and Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma) (n=173). Predictors of MDM2 amplification (e.g., cytological atypia) vs. Absence of predictive features was evaluated on MDM2 amplification (OR 15.03, 95% CI 3.07-73.68, p=<0.001). Cytological atypia was the strongest independent predictor of MDM2 amplification in lipomatous tumors (OR 15.03), alongside age ≥60 years, size ≥15cm, and thick septa on MRI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: