Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an analysis of recent work on nudging we distinguish three positions on the relationship between nudging founded in libertarian paternalism and the protection of personal autonomy through informed consent. We argue that all three positions fail to provide adequate protection of personal autonomy in the clinical context. Acknowledging that nudging may be beneficial, we suggest a fourth position according to which nudging and informed consent are valuable in different domains of interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ploug et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: