Key result
Higher CPET haemodynamic gain index is linked to ~16% lower SCD risk, dependent on fitness.
Why the study?
Haemodynamic gain index is a novel parameter obtainable from cardiopulmonary exercise testing, but its association with sudden cardiac death was unknown.
Does a higher Haemodynamic Gain Index (HGI) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict a lower risk of sudden cardiac death in middle-aged men?
Cohort (n=1,897)
Does a higher Haemodynamic Gain Index (HGI) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict a lower risk of sudden cardiac death in middle-aged men?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher Haemodynamic Gain Index during exercise testing is associated with a lower long-term risk of sudden cardiac death in men, though cardiorespiratory fitness remains a stronger predictor.
Introduction: Haemodynamic gain index (HGI) is a novel haemodynamic parameter which can be obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), but its association with sudden cardiac death (SCD) is not known. We aimed to assess the association of HGI with SCD risk in a long-term prospective cohort study. Methods: HGI was calculated using heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP) responses measured in 1897 men aged 42–61 years during CPX from rest to peak exercise, using the formula: Heartratemax×SBPmax−Heartraterest×SBPrest/Heartraterest×SBPrest. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured using respiratory gas exchange analysis. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were estimated for SCD. Results: During a median follow-up of 28.7 years, 205 SCDs occurred. The risk of SCD decreased gradually with increasing HGI (p value for non-linearity = 0.63). A unit (bpm/mm Hg) higher HGI was associated with a decreased risk of SCD (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71–0.99), which was attenuated following adjustment for CRF. CRF was inversely associated with SCD, which remained after further adjustment for HGI (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77–0.94) per each unit higher CRF. Addition of HGI to a SCD risk prediction model containing established risk factors improved risk discrimination (C-index change = 0.0096; p = 0.017) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement [NRI] = 39.40%, p = 0.001). The corresponding values for CRF were (C-index change = 0.0178; p = 0.007) and (NRI = 43.79%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Higher HGI during CPX is associated with a lower SCD risk, consistent with a dose-response relationship but dependent on CRF levels. Though HGI significantly improves the prediction and classification of SCD beyond common cardiovascular risk factors, CRF remains a stronger risk indicator and predictor of SCD compared to HGI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laukkanen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Sudden cardiac death (n=1,897). Haemodynamic gain index (HGI) was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death (SCD) (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). A higher haemodynamic gain index during cardiopulmonary exercise testing was associated with a decreased risk of sudden cardiac death (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99), though dependent on fitness levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: