Key result
A 6-week slow-paced breathing protocol without biofeedback significantly improved subjective training performance (β = 0.64, p < 0.01) and total recovery in adolescent swimmers compared to no treatment.
Why the study?
The study examined the effect of a slow-paced breath without biofeedback protocol on semi-elite adolescent swimmers' psychological and physiological states during ecological training.
Does a Slow-Paced Breathing without Biofeedback protocol improve recovery states and heart rate variability in adolescent swimmers?
RCT (n=13)
Open-label
Randomly assigned
No
Does a Slow-Paced Breathing without Biofeedback protocol improve recovery states and heart rate variability in adolescent swimmers?
Effect estimate: β = 0.64
p-value: p=<0.01
A 6-week slow-paced breathing protocol improved subjective recovery and perceived control in adolescent swimmers, though it did not significantly alter physiological heart rate variability markers.
Supports subjective gains in adolescent swimmers; extends non-biofeedback breathing evidence while leaving physiological markers unresolved.
This study examined the effect of a Slow-Paced Breath (i.e., 6 breaths per minute) without Biofeedback (SPB-NoHRVB) protocol on semi-elite adolescent swimmers' psychological and physiological states during a seven-week ecological training period. A linear mixed-effects multilevel regression analysis approach was used with 13 adolescent national-level swimmers. Athletes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 7) and a control group (n = 6). Seven waves of assessments were completed weekly during a seven-week training preparation in ecological conditions. During the protocol, swimmers completed subjective quantitative measures (RESTQ-36-R-Sport; cognitive perceived stress and control states about the training process, training subjective performance, and subjective internal training load) and physiological heart rate (HR) (HR of exercise, absolute and normalized HR recovery during the first 60 s of recovery; HRR60 and nHRR60) and heart rate variability (HRV) (MeanRR, RMSSD, LFnu and HFnu, LF/HF ration) tests (through a submaximal heart rate (5'-5' test) once a week. Results revealed that the SPB-NoHRVB protocol significantly predicts biopsychosocial recovery states, cognitive perception of control, and training subjective performance (i.e., a significant effect of the SPB-NoHRVB protocol with the dependent variables simple time trajectories). However, no significant effects were found for biopsychosocial stress scales, cognitively perceived stress, HR, or HRV markers. Our results suggest that SPB-NoHRVB induces simple evolutions over time for crucial variables in athletes' adaptation to the training process (i.e., cognitive appraisals and biopsychosocial states). In contrast, it highlights that SPB-NoHRVB does not induce better stress states. This specific effect on the resource component is an exciting result that will be discussed in the manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merlin et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Healthy (semi-elite adolescent swimmers) (n=13). Slow-Paced Breath without Biofeedback (SPB-NoHRVB) vs. No treatment was evaluated on Subjective training performance (time*group interaction) (β = 0.64, p=<0.01). A 6-week slow-paced breathing protocol without biofeedback significantly improved subjective training performance (β = 0.64, p < 0.01) and total recovery in adolescent swimmers compared to no treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: