Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical research on democratization is dominated by case studies and small-N comparisons. This article is a first attempt to take stock of qualitative case-based research on democratization. It finds that most articles use methods implicitly rather than explicitly and are disconnected from the burgeoning literature on case-based methodology. This makes it difficult to summarize the substantive findings or to evaluate the contributions of the various approaches to our knowledge of democratic transition and consolidation. There is much to gain from a closer collaboration between methods experts and empirical researchers of democratization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthijs Bogaards (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: