Why the study?
Comprehensive valve physiology during dobutamine stress remains incompletely characterized in patients with low-gradient aortic valve stenosis who potentially have symptoms from their stenosis.
Does dobutamine stress testing with invasive assessment identify severe hemodynamics in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=18)
Does dobutamine stress testing with invasive assessment identify severe hemodynamics in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis?
A significant minority of patients with low-gradient AS reach a severity during dobutamine stress equivalent to patients undergoing TAVI, suggesting potential benefit from intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support invasive dobutamine testing to identify severe low-gradient AS; leaves open need for trials to assess TAVI benefit.
BackgroundPotentially some patients have symptoms that arise from their low-gradient aortic valve stenosis (AS). Comprehensive valve physiology with dobutamine stress remains incompletely characterized in this population.MethodsA cohort of 18 subjects with low-gradient AS underwent graded dobutamine infusion with invasive assessment using 0.014” pressure wires. A subset of 4 subjects received thermodilution cardiac output assessment at each stage.ResultsPeak dobutamine hemodynamics could not be predicted from clinical or baseline parameters, reflecting statistically the physiologic heterogeneity of the measured pressure loss versus flow curves. While 0 subjects had a baseline aortic/left ventricular pressure ratio during ejection <0.71, 7 of 18 subjects (39%) achieved a ratio during peak dobutamine (the so-called stress aortic valve index, SAVI) below this threshold derived from a prior study of patients undergoing routine transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).ConclusionFor low-gradient AS, the hemodynamic changes from resting to peak dobutamine conditions cannot be predicted in advance due to pressure loss versus flow curve heterogeneity. A sizable minority of low-gradient AS reaches a severity during dobutamine stress equivalent to patients undergoing TAVI for established benefit. Whether this subset receives similar clinical advantage remains an unproven but natural hypothesis raised by our study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zelis et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Low-gradient aortic stenosis (n=18). Graded dobutamine infusion with invasive assessment vs. Baseline was evaluated on Aortic/left ventricular pressure ratio during ejection <0.71 (stress aortic valve index, SAVI).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: