Randomized trial demonstrates transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation lowers hospitalization costs in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, suggesting critical care economic benefits.
Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) accounts for only 5% of strokes in the United States but imposes substantial economic burdens on healthcare systems, with hospitalization costs exceeding $90,000 per patient. This study evaluated the economic implications of incorporating transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) into standard aSAH management.Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH) trial, a single-center trial enrolling adult patients with spontaneous SAH, randomized 1:1 to receive either taVNS or sham stimulation. Cost data were sourced from institutional accounting databases. The primary economic outcomes included total hospitalization costs, resource utilization across service lines, and 30-day readmission rates. Cost and utilization analyses were stratified by Hunt and Hess grades and compared between the treatment arms.Results: The taVNS group (n=13) had lower 30-day hospitalization costs than the sham group (n=14) ($82,632 vs. $103,998, P=0.003), representing a 20.54% reduction. Resource utilization was lower in the taVNS than the sham group for multiple service areas, including respiratory (17.00 vs. 64.60 charges per patient, P=0.003), laboratory (112.23 vs. 140.36 charges per patient, P<0.001), and pharmacy services (266.54 vs 313.29 charges per patient, P=0.004). Additionally, the taVNS group had lower 30-day readmission rates (7.7% vs. 28.6%) and readmission costs ($2,716 vs. $13,085).Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that taVNS reduces hospital costs and service utilization in patients with aSAH. Multicenter validation is warranted; however, these findings suggest that taVNS offers a novel strategy for improving resource utilization and costs in critical care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olufawo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: