Key result
taVNS safely and moderately increases parasympathetic activity vs sham in subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Why the study?
The effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill subarachnoid hemorrhage patients had not yet been investigated, which is essential to ensure its safety.
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) safely affect cardiovascular function in critically ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage?
RCT (n=24)
randomized
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) safely affect cardiovascular function in critically ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.5
taVNS appears to be a safe immunomodulatory treatment approach for SAH patients without inducing adverse cardiovascular effects like bradycardia or QT prolongation.
Supports further evaluation of taVNS for autonomic modulation in subarachnoid hemorrhage; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
Introduction Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is characterized by intense central inflammation, leading to substantial post-hemorrhagic complications such as vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Given the anti-inflammatory effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and its ability to promote brain plasticity, taVNS has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for SAH patients. However, the effects of taVNS on cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients, like those with SAH, have not yet been investigated. Given the association between cardiac complications and elevated risk of poor clinical outcomes after SAH, it is essential to characterize the cardiovascular effects of taVNS to ensure this approach is safe in this fragile population. Therefore, we assessed the impact of both acute taVNS and repetitive taVNS on cardiovascular function in this study. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 24 SAH patients were assigned to either a taVNS treatment or a Sham treatment group. During their stay in the intensive care unit, we monitored patient electrocardiogram (ECG) readings and vital signs. We compared long-term changes in heart rate, heart rate variability, QT interval, and blood pressure between the two groups. Additionally, we assessed the effects of acute taVNS by comparing cardiovascular metrics before, during, and after the intervention. We also explored acute cardiovascular biomarkers in patients exhibiting clinical improvement. Results We found that repetitive taVNS did not significantly alter heart rate, QT interval, blood pressure, or intracranial pressure. However, taVNS increased overall heart rate variability and parasympathetic activity compared to the sham treatment. The increase in parasympathetic activity was most pronounced from 2–4 days after initial treatment (Cohen’s d = 0.50). Acutely, taVNS increased heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral perfusion index without affecting the corrected QT interval, intracranial pressure, or heart rate variability. The acute post-treatment elevation in heart rate was more pronounced in patients who experienced a decrease of more than one point in their Modified Rankin Score at the time of discharge. Conclusions Our study found that taVNS treatment did not induce adverse cardiovascular effects, such as bradycardia or QT prolongation, supporting its development as a safe immunomodulatory treatment approach for SAH patients. The observed acute increase in heart rate after taVNS treatment may serve as a biomarker for SAH patients who could derive greater benefit from this treatment. Trial registration NCT04557618
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=24). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) vs. Sham treatment was evaluated on Long-term changes in heart rate, heart rate variability, QT interval, and blood pressure (Cohen's d 0.50). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation was safe and increased parasympathetic activity (Cohen's d = 0.50) compared to sham treatment in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: